美籍华人康继周先生谈疫苗注射 之(1-3)

Vaccine Companies Investigated for Manslaughter 〔由于人们受残害疫苗药厂受调查〕

A formal investigation has been launched by French authorities against two managers from drug companies GlaxoSmithKline and Sanofi Pasteur. A second investigation for manslaughter has also been opened against Sanofi Pasteur MSD.

The investigations are in response to allegations that the companies failed to fully disclose side effects from an anti-hepatitis B drug used between 1994 and 1998.

During this time, close to two-thirds of the French population, and almost all newborn babies, received a hepatitis B vaccine. The vaccination campaign was halted after concerns rose over the shot’s side effects.

Thirty plaintiffs, including the families of five people who died after the vaccination, have launched a civil action in the case against the drug companies.

Sources:

  Reuters February 1, 2008

In the United States, the hepatitis B vaccine is recommended for all newborns before they are discharged from the hospital. These recommendations are inexcusable.

It finally seems that the drug companies will be held responsible for the consequences of giving this dangerous vaccine to infants.

Why it Makes No Sense to Give the Hepatitis B Vaccine to Newborns

Folks, let’s make on thing perfectly clear here, hepatitis B is VERY difficult to catch. You nearly always need to have blood or sexual contact of some sort with an infected carrier. That is why the main risk factors for hepatitis B are IV drug abusers and those who engage in sex with multiple partners.

This, of course, makes it nearly impossible for a newborn to contract hepatitis B, unless his mother already has it.

Further, vaccine-derived immunity is thought to be short-lived, and between 30 percent to 50 percent of vaccinated individuals may lose their antibodies within seven years.

Meanwhile, up to 60 percent of people who initially respond will lose detectable antibodies within 12 years. So that means that by the time these newborns get to the age when they could potentially engage in the risky behaviors that would put them at risk of hepatitis B, their childhood vaccine will provide little to no protection.

The central nervous system of a newborn infant is also particularly susceptible to toxic influences. This is one of the reasons why the hepatitis B vaccine is such a problem. If it were given later in life, as is done in many other countries, it would not be as problematic.

Even so, this vaccine is still associated with numerous side effects, such as an increased risk of multiple sclerosis and rheumatoid diseases.

Do Your Homework Before Vaccinating: The Drug Companies Won’t do it For You

Aside from highlighting the extreme lack of common sense that goes along with vaccinating a newborn against a disease they have a rare chance of getting until they’re much older, this article points out, once again, that the drug companies are not on your side.

Their primary motivation is in making profits, and if that means covering up side effects to make you believe a vaccination is safe, they will likely do it.

Remember, you do have the right to refuse vaccinations, and there are two basic axioms you should never forget.

    1. Nobody, anywhere or any time and under any circumstances has the right or power in this country to immunize you or your children against your will and conviction. If they attempt to do so, you can legally charge them with "assault with a deadly weapon" and have the full resources of the law behind you.

    2.  At all times in attempting to avoid unwanted immunization, you have the Law of the Land behind you. Those who would try to vaccinate you against your will are on very shaky ground. Into every compulsory immunization law in America are written legal exceptions and waivers, which are there specifically to protect you from the attempted tyranny of officialdom. It is not only your right, but your obligation to use them, if this is what your conscience tells you.

While all 50 states have immunization requirements, 28 allow parents to opt out for medical or religious reasons. Another 20 states allow parents to opt out for personal or philosophical reasons as well.

My previous article, How to Avoid Unwanted Immunizations of All Kinds, lays out your opt-out steps in greater detail. There is also an entire chapter in my book Take Control of Your Health devoted to this very topic, including what you should know before vaccinating, and what to do if you decide not to.

Related Links:

  Childhood Vaccine Safety Studies are Largely 'Inadequate'

  The Truth Behind the Vaccine Coverup

  How America Was Blinded by Merck's Vaccine Lies 〔我有不少的病人因用此Merck药厂的疫苗，以后导致多种慢性病。〕

美籍华人康继周先生谈疫苗注射  之二

    美籍华人康继周先生谈疫苗注射之三

                    以下摘自《康氏信息医学》第120、121页

    有一些研究表明，经过疫苗注射后疾病受到控制，但是很多疫苗是不安全的。一是“疫苗成分”，注射后会产生一系列不良反应和疾病。二是由于“疫苗病因信息”，它会对接受疫苗注射者在有生之年造成各式各样的慢性病。

    经过多年的对比观察，由上可知预防接种的益处并不是所说的那样。现在提一些预防注射后的常见不良反应是：

1.  持续尖叫，或高声啼哭，或不同寻常的哭。

2.  反应迟钝，茫然凝视。

3.  发烧或伴有抽搐。

4.  极度懒洋洋，做任何事，如起床、睡觉、吃饭等都比平常慢。

5.  呕吐。

6.  腹泻。

7.  头痛、恶心、或头晕。

8.  无力，或面色苍白。

9.  注射局部异常浮肿或痛。

预防注射造成的常见疾病有：

1.   免疫功能障碍

2.   关节痛

3.   癫痫

4.   脑炎

5.   痴呆

6.   孤独症

7.   多发性硬化

8.   糖尿病

9.   慢性疲劳

10.  老年性痴呆

    在发达国家中，不少人从书本和网上读到一些权威性医学机构的报告，以及他人或自身的体会，对预防注射产生了畏惧。其实世界卫生组织(WHO)，美国医学会（AMA），美国儿科学会(AAP)，联邦疾病控制中心（CDC）,食品药物管理署（FDA），疫苗制造厂以及医学杂志，都知道上述情况，但是它们总以含蓄的协议来隐瞒事实，将真实情况降到最低限度。

近几年来人们已能通过不少渠道得知预防注射的危害。有的医生指出每年死于预防注射的人比死于枪杀和车祸的总和还多。甚至更有人说预防注射会使人类灭绝。在这种情况下美国不少公民要求政府修改法律。以美国德克萨斯州为例，2003年7月州长已签署法律，2003年9月1日生效，准许父母不让儿童接种。也就是说未经疫苗注射的学童，扔能进入公立学校就读。以前只许医师决定和宗教上的理由才能免于注射。