了解科技前沿的网站 科技前沿:未来我们怎么看电视(2)

科技前沿:未来我们怎么看电视(2)  

The jury in that case ruled that 26 Samsung's products violated six Apple patents and awarded Apple $1.05 billion in damages.
But the judge in the case
Lucy Koh
later denied Apple's request to ban the sale of the 26 products. Judge Koh ruled that Apple didn't satisfactorily link any harm it may have suffered in the market to Samsung's infringement. Apple is appealing that ruling.
Since then
Samsung has stopped selling many of those 26 products. But the case still has big ramifications
legal experts say
because the Federal Circuit could drastically redefine whether─or when─panies should be able to knock petitors' products off the shelves after findings of infringement.
此后，三星停止销售涉嫌侵权的26款产品中的很多产品。但法律专家们说，该案仍将产生巨大影响，因为美国联邦巡回上诉法院可能从很大程度上重新界定在败诉公司被判侵权后，胜诉公司是否或何时应该能够看到竞争对手的产品下架。
'The appeal is really about how hard will it be for Apple to get injunctions in future cases
' said Brian Love
a patent expert and law professor at Santa Clara University.
'If the law tilts in its favor
their bargaining power goes up in future cases
' he said. Mr. Love said Apple would gain leverage in a second suit brought in San Jose federal court
involving a set of newer Samsung phones.
Apple filed claims against Samsung at the ITC in 2011
claiming that the pany's products infringed several patents. An ITC judge agreed with Apple with regard to four patents
one of which relates to the basic design of the iPhone as a handheld rectangle with rounded corners.
On Friday
the full mission is slated to unveil its review of the case.
A broad finding of infringement could halt U.S. imports of some Samsung devices and
as Samsung's lawyers wrote in a June filing
'create an immediate and long-lasting shortfall in the availability of mobile devices in the U.S. market.'