您现在的位置是：首页 > 网友时评

Nature上发了一篇题目荒唐的通讯(Correspondence)

学术不端论文抄袭剽窃问题 Nature通讯中国期刊跨界合作

火烧 2010-09-10 00:00:00 网友时评 1025

Nature通讯指出，浙江大学学报自然科学版发现31%的投稿存在剽窃问题，引发学术界对抄袭现象的关注。文章强调加强学术规范，反对文化误解，推动国际合作打击学术不端。

9月9日Nature上发了浙江大学学报自然科学版一编辑(Yuehong Zhang)的一篇题目吓人的短信《中国杂志的稿件31%是剽窃的》，文后有三个评论。现一并转载如下（PDF见附件）：

Nature | Correspondence | Opinion

Chinese journal finds 31% of submissions plagiarized

Yuehong Zhang[email protected]

Journal name

Nature 467 , 153 (09 September 2010) DOI:doi:10.1038/467153d Date published:，doi:10.1038/467153d

Page:Published online

08 September 2010

Since October 2008, we have detected unoriginal material in a staggering 31% of papers submitted to the Journal of Zhejiang University–Science (692 of 2,233 submissions). The publication, designated as a key academic journal by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, was the first in China to sign up for CrossRef's plagiarism-screening service CrossCheck (Nature 466, 167; 2010).

We are therefore campaigning for authors, researchers and editors to be on the alert for plagiarism and to work against cultural misunderstandings. In ancient China, for example, students were typically encouraged to copy the words of their masters.

To this end, we have given lectures and written three papers (including Y. H. Zhang Learn. Publ. 23, 9–14; 2010) that have been widely publicized in China's media (see http://go.nature.com/dPey7X; in Chinese) and reported in CrossRef's quarterly online news magazine (see http://go.nature.com/icUwvh). Our website displays the CrossCheck logo to remind authors of their responsibilities.

Other Chinese journals are also policing plagiarism, using software launched in 2008 by China's Academic Journals Electronic Publishing House and Tongfang Knowledge Network Technology in Beijing.

Author information

· Author information

· Comments

Affiliations

1. Journal of Zhejiang University–Science, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou 310027, China
[email protected]

o Yuehong Zhang

Contributions to Correspondence may be submitted to [email protected]; see http://go.nature.com/cMCHno.

Comments

· Author information

· Comments

1. 2010-09-08 07:08 AM

Report this comment #13472

Tommy Tong said:

Plagiarism and citing others' work are different things. I believe scholars in ancient China cite rather than plagiarize (see the Analects of Confucius, for example). Plagiarism often has selfish connotations – such as monetary or other rewards, whereas citing others' work gives regards to the original author(s) and can be considered an act of generosity or respect. Plagiarism is a product of the reward-centered modern world.

2. 2010-09-08 08:51 AM

Report this comment #13474

S.P. Li said:

I was surprised to the title, and eager to know the details. However, I thought the author mislead the readers definitely according to the text. I don't think it is acceptable that the author used Chinese journal instead of Journal of Zhejiang University?Science.

3. 2010-09-08 10:31 AM

Report this comment #13483

Z.D. Fisher said:

From their website (http://www.zju.edu.cn/jzus/), Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE(A/B/C) are international peer-reviewed journals. They have a world-wide authorship. It is 'Chinese journal' (more accurately, 'a' Chinese journal) in the title, not necessarily meaning 31% of submissions of 'Chinese authors'.
From this correspondence, we can see that some Chinese editors have realized this problem and made their efforts to struggle with misconduct.

很赞哦！ (1025)

Nature上发了一篇题目荒唐的通讯(Correspondence)

鲁迅确实应该“滚蛋”了

《决裂》给予我的几点启示!

相关文章