足球比赛需要多少个人 BBC初级口语:足球比赛为何不引进电子裁判?

BBC初级口语:足球比赛为何不引进电子裁判?  

Background:在2010世界杯比赛中，英格兰的一粒有效进球却被裁判误吹无效；而阿根廷在越位情况下对墨西哥的一粒进球，却被判有效。绿茵场上，裁判频频出现错误。为什么足球场上不引进现代电子技术来改变裁判的误判呢？这成为一大争议。
,【文本】,And yes, with the hindsight of video replays it was in. Frank Lampard, the England midfielder, chipped the keeper, the ball hit the underside of the crossbar, bounced over the goal-line and back out.,It all happened quickly and in a matter of split seconds, neither the referee nor his assistant had seen it and the game went on. So why not introduce technology which eliminates such mistakes by referees?,Well, the reasons for football's resistance are ideological and practical. Sepp Blatter, who's the president of the world football governing body, FIFA, says the anisation hasn't as yet e upon a foolproof system. Trials of the 3-D Hawk-Eye was found to be 95, and not 100 percent, accurate. Another system which uses a puter chip in the ball is too expensive as it requires the entire pitch to be wired.,Mr Blatter also said that the way the game is played and the technology available should be the same from grassroots to the top level. There is also the flow of the game to consider, which opponents fear would be spoiled by interruptions to solve disputes.,Then there's the slippery-slope argument – if instant technology is used to settle goals today, then why not for fouls tomorrow? But the final and perhaps most pelling reason for resisting technology and keeping referees fallible, is that despite the heartbreaks it keeps everyone talking.

,【口语突破】,hindsight
事后确认,midfielder
中场球员,chipped the keeper
吊射守门员,crossbar
球门横杆,split seconds
瞬间,eliminates
减少、消除,e upon
找到、碰到,foolproof system
错误防范系统,Hawk-Eye
鹰眼（电子裁判系统）,puter chip
电子芯片,wired
用线路接通,grassroots
基层、底层,slippery-slope argument
滑坡辩证法,fallible
容易犯错的,,（版权所有,转载请注明出处）