您现在的位置是:首页 > 网友时评

圣刊“Nature”报道“著名生物化学家”方是民被打案

火烧 2010-09-30 00:00:00 网友时评 1032
Nature报道著名生物化学家方是民遭人袭击事件,揭示其因调查科研造假而遭报复,引发对学术不端与人身安全的关注。

仅发一篇至今数据被质疑的论文就成为著名生物化学家的方舟子-方是民因被打又上今天出版的圣刊Nature了,而且还有他的标准像,多给他的祖国-美国增彩啊!Nature新闻附后供网友拜读:  

   

Published online 29 September 2010 | Nature 467, 511 (2010) | doi:10.1038/ 467511a    

News  

Brawl in   Beijing    

Critics of Chinese researchers targeted in physical attacks.  

David Cyranoski   

                                      Former biochemist Fang Shimin has made enemies after scrutinizing scientists’ reputations.FANG SHIMIN  

Science can be a rough game in   China  . On 29 August, on his way home from a tea house in   Beijing  , Fang Shimin was assaulted. The former biochemist — who for the past decade has run a website exposing scientific fraudsters — was chased by two men, caught and attacked with a hammer.  

"I believe they planned to kill me," he says. "The only way to shut me up is to kill me." He escaped with only minor cuts and bruises. In June, Fang Xuanchang, a journalist who had reported on corruption in science in   China  , was left with more serious injuries after two men assaulted him with steel rods.  

On 21 September, police arrested Xiao Chuanguo, a urologist at  Tongji   Medical   College  in   Wuhan  , on suspicion of master­minding both plots. Xiao could not be reached for comment, but has confessed his involvement to   Beijing  's police. Fang Shimin says Xiao could face 3–10 years in prison — or more if the charges become attempted murder.  

Xiao and Fang Shimin have never met or spoken, but their paths have crossed on the Internet — and in court. Xiao's clash with him, and with Fang Xuanchang, revolves around a surgical procedure devised by Xiao that aims to restore bladder and bowel function in patients with spina bifida or spinal-cord injuries. Xiao reported an impressive 87% success rate for the operation, which involves re-routing nerves1,2. In 2005, he was nominated for membership of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the elite body of the Chinese scientific world.  

Following his nomination, people started posting questions about Xiao's claims on Fang Shimin's website (http://fangzhouzi-xys.blogspot.com). Then in September 2005, Fang Shimin published an essay in Beijing Sci–Tech Report, which said that Xiao was not an associate professor at   New York   University   as he states in his CV, but only an assistant professor. Furthermore, the article said that only 4 of the 26 English-language publications Xiao listed were journal articles — the rest being abstracts from conference proceedings.  

It is not known if Fang Shimin's article affected the academy's decision, but Xiao was not made a member and has since sued Fang Shimin for libel five times. Fang Shimin, whose site has been criticized for giving contributors a platform for unjustified attacks on their enemies3, lost one case and won two, with the other two undecided. Meanwhile, criticism of the 'Xiao procedure' has continued. Last year, Fang Xuanchang published a series of articles questioning its efficacy, which may have prompted the attacks on him.   

ADVERTISEMENT  

             

Beijing-based lawyer Peng Jian says he has interviewed 20–30 patients who have experienced side effects after undergoing the Xiao procedure, and who are seeking compensation. This summer, the first   US   trial of the treatment reported ambiguous results in The Journal of Urology4, and two journal editorials said it should be considered experimental4.   

Fang Shimin, meanwhile, is unfazed by the attack. "It won't stop me," he says. "I will continue to do what I am doing."   

·                                 References  

1.                                                     Xiao, C.-G. Proc. Int. Conf. Urol. Shanghai, 2–4 July (2005).   

2.                                                     Xiao, C.-G. Eur. Urol. 49, 22-29 (2006).   

3.                                                     Cyranoski, D. Nature 441, 392-393 (2006).   

4.                                                     Peters, K. M. et al. J. Urol. 184, 702-708 (2010).   

相关文章

  • 央视防辐射服《真相调查》爆真相:方舟子是幕后推手
  • 方舟子:誉满天下 谤满天下
  • 亦明:方舟子与《中国青年报》邪恶同盟的终结(1)
  • 方舟子造假第六十九案:篡改报文
  • 吕永岩按:美教授再次公开怒斥方舟子,称其还剽窃了牛津大学出版社
  • 美教授发威:“我会考虑起诉方舟子”
  • 吕永岩就匿名“留言”再批黑教主“老方”
  • 《解放军报》刊吕永岩文,痛斥“新语丝”攻击共产党
  • 美国教授指责方舟子抄袭的公开信(中文授权译文)
  • 快看方舟子美国后院起火烧屁股
  • 上海老顾:批方舟子的左倾医学观
  • 驳方舟子:只有中国人才坐月子吗?
永远跟党走
  • 如果你觉得本站很棒,可以通过扫码支付打赏哦!

    • 微信收款码
    • 支付宝收款码